Skip to content

This Site is Intended for Healthcare Professionals Only

Search AI Powered

Latest Stories

Pfizer and Flynn fined £69m for charging excessive prices for epilepsy drug

A fine of £62,370,000 was imposed on Pfizer, and a fine of £6,704,422 on Flynn.
gettyimages

The original CMA investigation found that Pfizer and Flynn’s illegal behaviour led to NHS annual costs for phenytoin capsules rising from £2 million in 2012 to around £50 million in 2013

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) has imposed a total fine of £69m on pharmaceutical manufacturers Pfizer and Flynn Pharma for “charging excessive prices” for the life-saving epilepsy drug, phenytoin sodium capsules, between 2012 and 2016.


The tribunal ruled that both companies had intentionally abused their dominant positions in the market and were “gouging the market in a manner that can only be characterised as unjustifiable or opportunistic or – in a word – unfair.”

The fine imposed by the CAT is almost identical to the levels set earlier by the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).

Following a remittal from the CAT, the CMA reassessed its case and in 2022 imposed fines of approximately £70 million on Pfizer and Flynn, totaling £63.3 million and £6.7 million respectively, for breaching competition law.

In a statement, the CMA said that while it “agrees with the CAT’s conclusion that the firms’ pricing behaviour was abusive under competition law, and that significant fines are appropriate in this case,” it disagrees with the tribunal’s findings and reasoning regarding its decision.

The CMA added that it is “carefully considering whether to appeal the judgment.”

Overview of the case

The original CMA investigation in 2016 found that Pfizer and its distributor Flynn had increased the price for phenytoin capsules by 2,300–2,600%, causing annual NHS costs to rise from £2m in 2012 to around £50 million in 2013.

Both companies challenged this decision at the CAT, which upheld the CMA’s findings on market definition and dominance but set aside the conclusion that the companies’ prices were “an unlawful abuse of dominance.”

The case was then referred back to the CMA for further consideration in a process known as remittal.

Both the CMA and Flynn appealed to the Court of Appeal, which in March 2020 dismissed Flynn’s appeal and upheld aspects of the CMA’s appeal regarding unfair pricing. The CMA reopened its investigation in June 2020 and issued a remittal decision in July 2022.

Pfizer and Flynn appealed the remittal decision, and the CAT heard the case in November and December 2023. The tribunal’s judgment in November 2024 marks the outcome of that appeal.

In its statement, the CMA noted that the CAT had “agreed with most of the drug firms’ grounds of appeal, finding against the CMA in a number of matters, including in relation to the approach to calculating a ‘reasonable rate of return’, its assessment of unfairness, and the overall procedure followed.”

However, the CAT concluded that the firms had infringed the Chapter II prohibition of the Competition Act 1998 in 7 out of the 8 infringements originally found by the CMA.

Based on those infringement findings, the CAT imposed the same level of fines as the CMA, but for a 1% reduction of Pfizer’s fine.

The tribunal concluded that Pfizer’s prices for the 25mg Capsules did not infringe the Chapter II prohibition.

As a result, a fine of £62,370,000 was imposed on Pfizer, and a fine of £6,704,422 on Flynn.

More For You

Call to improve inclusivity in clinical research

Ethnic minority adults continue to be underrepresented in clinical trials.

iStock

Call to improve inclusivity in clinical research

A NEW report has called for the participation of a wide range of diverse communities in clinical research to make sure that the medicines meet the needs of the UK's increasingly diverse population.

The report ‘Achieving inclusivity in clinical research’, prepared by the Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) and the Association of Medical Research Charities (AMRC), highlights the long-standing challenges in ensuring diversity in clinical trials.

Keep ReadingShow less
Pharmacy students Learning Support Fund

Pharmacy students will be included in the Travel and Dual Accommodation Expenses section of the NHS Learning Support Fund.

iStock

Pharmacy students to have access to Learning Support Fund

FOR the first time in England, pharmacy students will be eligible to reimburse travel and accommodation costs while attending placements.

The Department of Health and Social Care confirmed that pharmacy students would finally be included in the Travel and Dual Accommodation Expenses (TDAE) section of the NHS Learning Support Fund (LSF).

Keep ReadingShow less
NHS for robotic surgery

Patients undergoing robotic surgery are able to recover quicker and be discharged sooner.

Pic credit: iStock

NHS pushes for robotic surgery to reduce waiting time, improve outcomes

The NHS is planning to step up robotic surgery over the next decade to reduce waiting time, help in the speed of recovery of patients, and shorter hospital stay.

As per the NHS projections, the number is expected to zoom from 70,000 in 2023/24 to half a million by 2035.

Keep ReadingShow less
Scotland's digital patient care record

The amendment ensures that every person who receives health care or a social service in Scotland will have a digital care record

Pic credit: iStock

Scotland's move to create digital patient care record hailed

The Royal Pharmaceutical Society (RPS) in Scotland has welcomed the decision of the Scottish Parliament to create an integrated digital patient care record.

The move came during a debate on the Care Reform (Scotland) Bill on Tuesday (10), when Jackie Baillie tabled an amendment to ensure that every person who receives health care or a social service in Scotland has a digital care record.

Keep ReadingShow less
A woman using a period tracker app

Cambridge University academics have flagged concerns over the safety of period tracker apps

Pic credit: iStock

Users of period tracking apps face privacy, safety risk, say experts

The report said the apps provide a "gold mine" of data for consumer profiling and warn that in the wrong hands it could pose a safety risk

CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY academics have flagged concerns over the safety of period tracker apps and warned that the women using them could face privacy and safety risks.

Keep ReadingShow less